A variety of weather-driven natural hazards, such as droughts and heatwaves, often occur throughout the world [1]. The
resultant impacts of the occurrence of these extremes have been exacerbated by an increase in their frequency and
intensity over the past few decades in Europe [2-6]. Due to the projected increase of these extreme events [2-3,6-7], combined
with larger exposure, exceptional risk to humans and ecosystems is expected [8]. Therefore, progressive
intensification of these hazards represents one of the most challenging impacts of climate change on society [8,9].
Natural hazards often result from interacting physical processes across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales [P1-
P4,6,9-14]. These types of interacting events are commonly referred as compound or cascading. Similarly to individual
extremes, positive trends in the frequency and severity of compound hot and dry events (hereafter CHD) have also been
reported [6,9,12], being responsible for wide-ranging impacts, namely morbidity and mortality [15-16], wildfires [17], air
pollution [16,18], and agricultural losses [19].
Several studies have addressed individual and CHD events in order to assess the costs and benefits of disaster risk reduction measures, both structural and nature-based. However, most of the approaches
do not account for the interplay between multiple hazards when addressing the impacts on natural and socioeconomic
sectors, although that might lead to the underestimation of risk [12]. Following the considerations formulated under the Sendai
Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, which highlights the need for multi-hazard early warning systems, an urgent call has
been issued to assess compound disasters and the associated risks rather than focusing on single hazards. Therefore, several
researchers started to focus their attention to the application of multi-hazards and compound approaches to tackle the caveats
resulting from centering on single hazards. Consequently, clear relationships were identified in Southern Europe between hot
and dry extremes [e.g. P1], which resulted in sectoral impacts [e.g. P2, P4,11,18].
DHEFEUS overarching goal is to improve the understanding on
CHD and further associate them to the occurrence of fires and pollution events in Mediterranean Europe (EU), by focusing on
their intricate chain of events through a compound-oriented framework.
Therefore, DHEFEUS will focus on 1) the driving mechanisms of individual and extreme events; 2) the assessment of the interaction between CHD events and
furthermore, between a) CHD and fires and b) CHD and pollution events from a multidisciplinary perspective, including
past, present and future climate conditions. This will be accomplished based on innovative methods (e.g., compound
event-oriented approaches [P1-P4,1,9-12-14,20,23-24,32], copula analyses [19] and climate-change sensitive methods
[30,32], supported by satellite-based datasets [23-24,27] and high-resolution regional modelling (Regional Climate Models’
outputs and regional simulations from WRF-Chem) of surfaceatmosphere feedbacks [30,32].
By studying on weather, fire activity and air pollution together, DEFHEUS will take into consideration the Paris Agreement and the UN Sustainable
Development Goals to improve lives in the present and under future climate warming conditions. This integrative approach
enables to account for synergies between different hazards, which constitutes an emerging and crucial line of research
within the scope of climate change. The proposed approach characterizes the multiple causes (low precipitation, extreme
temperatures) of single or compound outcomes (fires, high pollution), instead of tracing the impact of a single hazard to a
certain outcome [10,12,18,20].
DHEFEUS intends to answer several emerging and still
unanswered target questions (TQ):
TQ1: How do CHD events contribute do exacerbate the impacts on air quality in different sectors of Europe?
TQ2: What is the role of climate forcing factors (e.g., anomalous Sea Surface Temperature in the Atlantic, or predominant
phases of the main modes of atmospheric circulation like the North Atlantic Oscillation or Eastern Atlantic Oscillation) to the
occurrence of CHD events?
TQ3: How much the synergetic effect of CHD events and wildfires affect the terrestrial carbon budget?
TQ4: What are the main impacts of the CHF events, under future climate change conditions, in terms of extreme pollution events in different sectors of the Europe?
DHEFEUS proposes an integrated approach which will be carried out in 7 tasks (T#, see DHEFEUS_cronograma.pdf). T1
will be devoted to data acquisition and validation. T2 will address single and compound heatwaves and droughts,
identifying synergies, driving mechanisms and dominant atmospheric modes controlling single and combined events. T3
will analyze fires and their association to single and compound events as identified in T2. T4 will examine air pollution events,
especially those associated with wildfires and from long range transport. T2-T4 will allow resolving TQ1 and TQ2. T5 and T6
rely on T1-T4, focusing on more than two hazards (e.g., droughts, heatwaves and wildfires), providing an overview of
the likely impacts of fire emissions on terrestrial carbon cycle and of climate feedbacks in presence of single and combined
hazards, answering to TQ3. T7 is devoted to climate change and
proposes to analyze how extreme events will evolve in the
future, answering to TQ4.
To answer to the proposed TQ following a multi-hazard and multidisciplinary perspective, we propose to implement the following dedicated methodologies:
A)Drought and heatwaves will be identified using multiindicator approaches [P1-P3,10]. The indicators will use long
meteorological datasets (1979 to present), integrating recent gridded high-resolution data together with high spatialresolution
satellite information (e.g., MTG and Sentinel) with shorter duration, although allowing a good characterization of
droughts and heatwaves. In particular, multi-scalar drought indices like the Standardized Precipitation and
Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) [6], will be used to quantify the severity of the hazard. Exposure analysis and return periods will
be identified over EU to assist stakeholders’ decision-making process and the implementation of mitigation strategies.
B) Fires over Europe (since 2001) will be analyzed and characterized regarding its duration, intensity, and total burned
area based on national statistics available on EFFIS and from high temporal resolution remotely sensed products (c.f. T1, DS8
dataset). The meteorological and surface forcing mechanisms responsible for triggering large fires will be assessed [5]. Case
studies of extreme events (e.g., the 2017 and 2020 events in Portugal, 2021 in Greece and Turkey and 2022 in Ukraine) will
be identified and characterized using ERA-5 reanalysis datasets, WRF-Chem outputs and remote sensing data (c.f. T1, DS1, DS7,
DS8 datasets).
C) The identification of synergies, driving mechanisms and dominant atmospheric modes controlling single and CHD
events will be attempted, considering a wide spatial Europe-Atlantic region, using multivariate statistical analysis [P1,P3-
P4,5,9] and compound approaches [P2,10-14]. Synergies will be identified, together with their main drivers [P3,9], allowing the
characterization of the dependence structure between droughts and heatwaves. The probabilities of one hazard becoming
extreme given the occurrence of another hazard will be estimated, which constitute a valuable and attractive tool in risk
assessment [P2].
D) The links between fire activity and pollutants’ concentrations, namely contribution of biomass smoke to
records of air pollution and the importance of long-range transport, will be assessed over the EU, namely for case studies
using in-situ data from air quality monitoring stations and from Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring System (CAMS). Carbon
emissions will be derived from the Fire radiative power (FRP) [25] obtained from SEVIRI, MODIS/VIIRS and SENTINEL and
Ozone will be obtained from CAMS, allowing to assess the impact of the recent extreme fires on ozone and terrestrial
carbon budget and therefore evaluate the impact of single or CHD events on nowadays carbon budget. This will rely on DS5,
DS7, DS8 datasets (cf. T1).
E) CHD, forest fires and pollution events over Europe will be addressed based on twofold approach: 1) focusing on the
involved mechanisms, based on trend and extreme analysis, together with coupling metrics [e.g., P3, 9] and 2) focusing on
the characterization of the joint behavior of multiple hazards and the consequent risks based on statistical (Copulas) and
dynamical (WRF-Chem) approaches [P2,12,19,32]. A full characterization of the linear and nonlinear dependences
between variables allows for the characterization of the dependence structure between variables and the estimation of
conditional probabilities of one event given the occurrence of another event, constituting a valuable and attractive tool in risk
analysis [P2]. This twofold approach will permit to assess the role played by preceding and simultaneous dry and/or hot
conditions in the exacerbation of forest fires and resultant air pollution [23], and the identification of the key moments
(months, seasons) and timescales of dry and/or hot conditions involved in the reinforcement and triggering both fires and air
pollution events [23]. The use of both dynaical and statistical approaches relates to the fact that both have advantages and
caveats. WRF-Chem can predict meteorological conditions along with pollution level [32], although having limitations on
the parametrizations (e.g., terrain). Conversely, statistical approaches require much less computational power allowing
for similar results, but large training data sets are usually required to improve outputs’ accuracy and minimize
uncertainty [39]. This two-fold approach will be complementary and secure the proposed outcomes.
F) The evaluation of the impacts on the vegetation productivity of the synergetic effects of carbon and ozone
extremes associated with fires and CHD extremes will be performed using satellite derived information of vegetation
gross primary productivity. The disturbances on vegetation productivity will be analyzed using vegetation parameters
available from the LSA-SAF (LAI, FAPAR) and the NPP MODIS datasets (DS4 and DS5). Statistical approaches, such as
correlation and logistic regression, will be used to evaluate the effect of ozone extremes (DS9) associated with severe fires
(DS8) on the exacerbation of vegetation productivity losses (DS5), namely in water stress conditions (DS1).
G) Climate change assessment will be performed based on the ability of GCMs and RCMs to represent extremes, relying
preferentially on the CMIP6 and WRF-Chem runs. At the regional scale, climate change assessment will be performed based on
the full EURO-CORDEX regional climate simulations from CMIP6 [30] to feed the WRF-Chem model [32]. These will be validated
and ranked, aiming to build a multi-model ensemble based on the RCMs individual qualities to represent the actual main
drivers of CHD extremes in the IP, and their impacts on fires and mortality/morbidity outcomes. The statistical comparison of
the multi-model ensembles, future and present climates, will permit the quantification of future changes on the drivers and
properties of the hazards, and to characterize the uncertainty of the projections. Result will be used to support the construction
of the warning system, having in mind the amplitude of the uncertainty of future hazards.